ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society2026
Advances and challenges in the management of haemoptysis in the emergency department: A narrative review.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractHaemoptysis, defined as the expectoration of blood from the lower respiratory tract, can present to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms ranging from mild, self-limiting to massive haemorrhage. Severe presentations account for approximately 5% of cases, with mortality primarily because airway flooding with blood leading to hypoxia. This underscores the importance of early airway protection and structured resuscitation in emergency settings. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence to guide emergency physicians in the management of haemoptysis. Aetiologies vary geographically: pulmonary tuberculosis accounts for up to 40% of cases in low- and middle-income countries, whereas malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and bronchiectasis predominate in high-income regions. Management begins with differentiating haemoptysis from pseudohaemoptysis and gastrointestinal bleeding, followed by risk stratification and initial stabilization of the patient. CT angiography helps in localization of bleeding and underlying pathology, while flexible bronchoscopy is the gold standard for both diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Nebulized tranexamic acid is emerging as a rapid, localized, and safe adjunct in emergency settings, reducing the need for invasive procedures. Haemostasis can be achieved by bronchial artery embolization in over 90% of cases, while surgery is reserved for refractory or localized disease. Despite these advances, challenges remain in optimizing the timing and integration of imaging, pharmacological adjuncts, and invasive procedures. A multidisciplinary approach involving emergency physicians, pulmonologists, interventional radiologists, and thoracic surgeons is crucial to improving outcomes in this complex, potentially life-threatening condition. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and priorities for emergency management of massive haemoptysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.