ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
High-Sensitivity ctDNA Analysis Uncovers Relevant Signals Missed by NGS in Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries high mortality despite multimodal therapy, and improved biomarkers are needed to guide perioperative care. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS)-mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in localized PDAC. EXPERIMENTAL
designIn this prospective cohort study (2020-2024), patients with localized PDAC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were enrolled across multiple sites within Northwestern Medicine. Blood samples for ctDNA were assessed at diagnosis, after NAC, and after resection using tumor-agnostic NGS and ddPCR targeting KRAS G12D/V/R mutations. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
resultsThe cohort included 106 patients. At diagnosis, KRAS ctDNA was detected in 17.2% (17/99) by NGS and 64.9% (63/97) by ddPCR. Detection by both platforms was associated with shorter OS, with the higher-sensitivity ddPCR assay providing greater prognostic discrimination by identifying additional patients with poor outcomes not captured by NGS (NGS median OS 11.2 vs. 30.5 months, P < 0.001; ddPCR median OS 24.7 vs. 70.9 months, P = 0.004). Stratified by detection method, median OS was shortest in patients with ctDNA detected by both NGS and ddPCR (10.9 months), longest in those not detected by either platform (40.7 months), and intermediate in patients detected only by ddPCR (26.9 months; P < 0.001).
conclusionsIn localized PDAC, KRAS-mutant ctDNA detected by NGS or ddPCR was associated with worse survival. ddPCR identified additional patients missed by NGS. Integrating ddPCR with NGS ctDNA measures may improve perioperative risk stratification, although validation is needed before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.