ArticleJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2026
Ethnic and racial considerations in dental tooth extraction: a scoping review of current findings.
Article in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental extractions are among the most frequently performed procedures in dentistry. While anatomical, behavioral, and access-related factors are known to influence extraction outcomes, the role of racial and ethnic characteristics in shaping extraction techniques, preferences, and disparities has not been synthesized. This scoping review aimed to explore and map the existing evidence on how racial, ethnic factors influence dental tooth extraction. A search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords related to dental extraction, race, ethnicity, anatomy, and sociocultural behavior. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 15 studies were included, encompassing anthropological, clinical, forensic, public health perspectives. The review identified key racial anatomical traits (e.g., root morphology, dental arch form, bone density) that affect extraction difficulty, particularly among Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid populations. Ethnic and cultural factors-health beliefs, care-seeking behavior, and access disparities-played a role in extraction timing and technique. Provider bias, lack of diversity within the dental workforce emerged as contributing factors to inequitable care delivery. Integrating this understanding into dental education, clinical guidelines can support equitable, culturally competent care. Further research is warranted to bridge anatomical evidence with behavioral and structural determinants of extraction disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.