ArticlePolish journal of microbiology2026
Rapid Detection of Pathogens and Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Cultures Using BioFire
Article in Polish journal of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infections cause significant morbidity and mortality, and rapid identification of the causative microorganisms, along with their antimicrobial resistance profiles, is crucial for appropriate treatment. Molecular diagnostic systems such as the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel provide faster results than conventional culture-based methods. This study evaluated the performance of the BCID2 panel for rapid detection of microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance genes in 50 positive blood cultures collected at a university hospital between January 2023 and September 2025. All samples were obtained from peripheral blood cultures, and repeat or catheter-related cultures were excluded. Samples were analyzed using conventional culture methods, mass spectrometry-based identification, and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing, in parallel with the BCID2 panel. Resistance genes detected by the panel were confirmed using polymerase chain reaction. At least one microorganism was detected in forty-seven samples (94%), showing strong agreement between molecular and culture-based methods. Complete concordance was observed for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.