Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376950›Full record

ArticleNutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia2026

How do supermarkets shape the experience of vulnerable people in Australia's food system? A scoping review.

Casey E Webb, Jeremy Farr, Nathan Cook, Olivia R L Wright

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How do supermarkets shape the experience of vulnerable people in Australia's food system? A scoping review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  2. Placement poverty: Why it matters to all dietitians.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Casey E WebbSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jeremy FarrCSIRO, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Nathan CookSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-8495
Olivia R L WrightSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6483-6101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this scoping review was to synthesise how supermarkets shape health behaviours and nutrition-related outcomes of vulnerable populations in Australia.

methodsFive databases were searched and studies were included if they discussed Australia's major supermarket chains, their relationship with vulnerable populations, and outcomes linked to nutrition behaviour or health. Findings were synthesised narratively and reported using the food systems approach interdisciplinary conceptual framework.

resultsTwenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven studies investigated food access, six studies examined health behaviours, and four studies focused on nutrition-related health outcomes. Socioeconomic disadvantage was the only vulnerability explored across all studies. Large supermarket chains provided greater access and availability to foods of higher nutritional quality at lower prices than other types of stores; however, areas of lower socio-economic status experienced poorer proximity to supermarkets. Supermarket food prices were less affordable for low-income households in all locations. Individuals living in lower socio-economic areas had a higher risk of greater body size.

conclusionSupermarkets play a structural role in the health of socioeconomically vulnerable populations in Australia. Supermarkets are important for the provision of higher nutritional quality foods but can also have negative effects through the stocking and marketing of discretionary foods. Future research is required to understand the relationship between supermarkets and other populations experiencing disadvantage and/or vulnerability, such as those with physical disabilities, older adults, youth, and other cultural backgrounds. The extent of alternative food systems and community-based initiatives that provide food for these groups requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Food MarketsFood SupplyVulnerable PopulationsAustraliaCommerceHealth BehaviorHumansLow Socioeconomic StatusNutritive ValueSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic Factorsfood securityfood systemhealth behaviourssupermarketsvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID42376950
PMCPMC13575723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.