ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2026
Comparison of Premaxillary Dimensions in Patients with Palatally and Buccally Impacted Maxillary Canines and Those with Normally Erupted Canines: A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Research into the etiology of maxillary canine impaction (MCI) has focused primarily on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla in the premolar and molar regions. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare premaxillary width, height, depth, and volume -assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)- among individuals with palatal MCI, buccal MCI, and normally erupted maxillary canines. Methods: This retrospective study utilized CBCT records of patients with MCI. A total of 45 subjects were divided into three groups of 15 subjects each. Group I (palatal canine impaction), Group II (buccal canine impaction), and Group III (control group of normally erupted canines). Premaxillary width, height, depth, and volume were measured in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using Horos software. All measurements were performed by a single calibrated examiner. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis was applied; statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Premaxillary height, depth, and volume were significantly greater in both palatal canine impaction (Group I) and buccal canine impaction (Group II) groups compared to controls (Group III). The increase was greatest in Group I, and this difference among the three groups was statistically significant (p=0.04 for height, 0.0005 for depth, and 0.04 for volume). Premaxillary width did not differ significantly among groups (p=0.38). Post-hoc analysis revealed that premaxillary depth was significantly greater in both palatal and buccal impaction groups than in controls (p=0.021 and 0.002, respectively), while premaxillary volume was significantly greater in the palatal than in the buccal canine impaction group (p=0.03). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that three-dimensional premaxillary morphology, as assessed by CBCT -particularly increased depth and volume- may be associated with MCI, with a more pronounced effect in palatal impaction. Premaxillary width did not demonstrate a significant association. These results indicate that localized anterior maxillary skeletal characteristics, rather than transverse maxillary deficiency alone, may influence the eruptive pathway of maxillary canines. These findings represent associations and do not establish causality. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these findings and to explore their clinical implications for early orthodontic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.