Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376678›Full record

ArticleDigital journal of ophthalmology : DJO2025

Association of stage of diabetic retinopathy on intraocular pressure.

Chevy Singh, Louis B Cantor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chevy Singh *Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Louis B Cantor *Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether stage of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: The medical records of patients seen in the outpatient ophthalmology clinic at Sidney & Lois Eskenazi Community Hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana, from January 2022 to August 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. The highest IOP of those presenting without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), T2DM without DR, and varying severity of DR was recorded. Main outcome measures included median and average IOPs recorded from patients who presented without diabetes, diabetes without retinopathy, and mild, moderate, severe nonproliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Comparisons between groups generated Results: A total of 389 patients (759 eyes) were included. Mean patient age was 58. Male patients accounted for 286 eyes (37.7%); Hispanic patients, for 270 eyes (35.6%); patients identifying as black, for 261 eyes (34.4%); white patients, for 195 eyes (25.7%); and Asian patients, for 33 eyes (4.3%). Overall, analysis showed IOP increased between eyes without T2DM compared with mild nonproliferative DR ( Conclusions: In our study cohort, there was a positive correlation between elevated IOP and more advanced stage of DR, indicating that patients with diabetes but no findings of DR on retinal examination seem to be at greater risk of elevated IOP than those with mild-to-moderate DR. These results suggest that IOP in patients with T2DM, with or without DR, should be closely monitored over time to prevent future IOP-related complications.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyIntraocular PressureAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTonometry, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID42376678
PMCPMC13313142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.