Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376641›Full record

ArticleTransactions on machine learning research2024

Scaling Up Bayesian Neural Networks with Neural Networks.

Zahra Moslemi, Yang Meng, Shiwei Lan, Babak Shahbaba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions on machine learning research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahra MoslemiDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Yang MengDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Shiwei LanSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Babak ShahbabaDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

Scalable Bayesian Stochastic Process Models for Neural Data AnalysisR01MH115697 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SHAHBABA, BABAK · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
SCH: Individualized learning and prediction for heterogeneous multimodal data from wearable devicesR01CA297869 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI Yuqing Guo, Annie Qu · 2024 to 2026
$900k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA297869NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) offer a principled and natural framework for proper uncertainty quantification in the context of deep learning. They address the typical challenges associated with conventional deep learning methods, such as data insatiability, ad-hoc nature, and susceptibility to overfitting. However, their implementation typically either relies on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which are characterized by their computational intensity and inefficiency in a high-dimensional space, or variational inference methods, which tend to underestimate uncertainty. To address this issue, we propose a novel Calibration-Emulation-Sampling (CES) strategy to significantly enhance the computational efficiency of BNN. In this framework, during the initial calibration stage, we collect a small set of samples from the parameter space. These samples serve as training data for the emulator, which approximates the map between parameters and posterior probability. The trained emulator is then used for sampling from the posterior distribution at substantially higher speed compared to the standard BNN. Using simulated and real data, we demonstrate that our proposed method improves computational efficiency of BNN, while maintaining similar performance in terms of prediction accuracy and uncertainty quantification.

Identifiers

PMID42376641
PMCPMC13313050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.