ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Surfactant-Engineered Niosomal Antibiotic Systems for Biofilm-Associated Infections: Design Principles and Translational Perspectives.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liposomes, Niosomes, Ethosomes, and Transethosomes for Curcumin and Chlorogenic Acid Delivery: Formulation Design and Dermal Performance.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent microbial biofilm infections remain a major obstacle to effective antimicrobial therapy due to restricted drug diffusion, metabolic heterogeneity, and the presence of tolerant bacterial subpopulations. In device-associated infections, biofilms substantially reduce antibiotic efficacy and contribute to chronic relapse despite adequate systemic exposure. Although nanocarrier-based delivery systems have been widely investigated, many formulations remain empirically developed with insufficient consideration of biofilm-specific physicochemical and biological barriers. This review examines surfactant-engineered niosomal antibiotic systems from a rational design perspective. Key formulation parameters, including surfactant type, hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB), cholesterol content, surface charge, and microenvironment-responsive behavior, critically influence bilayer rigidity, permeability, encapsulation efficiency, intrabiofilm transport, and release kinetics. In particular, electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix and pH-responsive destabilization strategies are discussed as important determinants of localized antibiotic delivery within heterogeneous biofilm environments. Despite promising antibiofilm activity in vitro, translational progress remains limited by variability in formulation characterization, insufficient in vivo validation, and incomplete alignment between carrier responsiveness and biofilm microenvironmental conditions. By integrating insights from pharmaceutics, materials science, and microbial pathophysiology, this review proposes a structured framework for the rational design of surfactant-engineered niosomes and highlights key considerations for advancing antibiofilm nanomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.