ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2026
Driving clinical excellence through a management driven framework for integrating nuclear medicine into hospital ecosystems.
Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Nuclear medicine (NM) often functions as an isolated diagnostic island within hospitals, resulting in the underutilization of high-value molecular imaging resources despite their significant clinical potential. This paper proposes a conceptual management-driven framework, termed the Management-Driven Integration Loop, to break down these silos and integrate NM into the broader hospital ecosystem to potentially enhance clinical decision-making and operational efficiency. Methods: A comprehensive integration framework was developed based on four strategic pillars: strategic resource allocation, process re-engineering, performance leverage, and brand building. The framework introduces specific administrative interventions, including the establishment of satellite workstations to improve clinical proximity, the creation of a Clinical-NM Liaison role to bridge interdisciplinary gaps, and the implementation of a multidimensional Total Performance Index (TPI) to align incentives. Framework components: Integration is envisioned through protocol-based clinical pathways embedded in electronic health records and structured Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) collaboration, ensuring NM expertise may inform treatment planning. The framework incorporates a continuous feedback loop to track clinical impact, including diagnostic upstaging and the avoidance of unnecessary procedures. By proposing a shift from volume-based metrics to the TPI, administrators can weight qualitative clinical contributions and interdisciplinary collaboration alongside traditional procedural throughput. Conclusions: Transforming nuclear medicine into a central strategic asset requires deliberate administrative intervention. While implementation depends on overcoming institutional, technical, and regulatory barriers, this management-driven integration loop aims to bridge the gap between technological potential and clinical impact, improve patient outcomes through precision diagnostics, and strengthen institutional positioning as centers of excellence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.