Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376611›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2025

Towards the Efficient Inference by Incorporating Automated Computational Phenotypes under Covariate Shift.

Chao Ying, Jun Jin, Yi Guo, Xiudi Li, Muxuan Liang, Jiwei Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao YingDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jun JinHenry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Yi GuoDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Xiudi LiBiostatistics Division, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Muxuan LiangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jiwei ZhaoDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

CoPE II: Individualizing patient-reported outcomes in patient care for vocal fold paralysis in the clinic and in researchR01DC021431 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI David O. Francis, Jiwei Zhao · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC021431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collecting gold-standard phenotype data via manual extraction is typically labor-intensive and slow, whereas automated computational phenotypes (ACPs) offer a systematic and much faster alternative. However, simply replacing the gold-standard with ACPs, without acknowledging their differences, could lead to biased results and misleading conclusions. Motivated by the complexity of incorporating ACPs while maintaining the validity of downstream analyses, in this paper, we consider a semi-supervised learning setting that consists of both labeled data (with gold-standard) and unlabeled data (without gold-standard), under the covariate shift framework. We develop doubly robust and semiparametrically efficient estimators that leverage ACPs for general target parameters in the unlabeled and combined populations. In addition, we carefully analyze the efficiency gains achieved by incorporating ACPs, comparing scenarios with and without their inclusion. Notably, we identify that ACPs for the unlabeled data, instead of for the labeled data, drive the enhanced efficiency gains. To validate our theoretical findings, we conduct comprehensive synthetic experiments and apply our method to multiple real-world datasets, confirming the practical advantages of our approach.

Identifiers

PMID42376611
PMCPMC13310800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.