Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376558›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Effect of dietary

Muhammad Yasir Shah, Shakeeb Ullah, Ali Zaman, Faiqah Ramzan, Saifur Rehman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Yasir ShahFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Shakeeb UllahFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Ali ZamanFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Faiqah RamzanFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Saifur RehmanFaculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Swat, Pakistan.

Funding

Faculty of Veterinary and Animal SciencesGomal UniversityUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Swat
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: This study investigated the impact of incorporating Methods: Over an 8-week period, 40 30-week-old Hy-Line Brown layers were randomly distributed into four dietary groups (10 birds per group) and received nutritionally balanced diets with MOLM supplementation levels of 0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, or 7.5%. The key performance indicators, including feed intake, egg production, egg weight, and FCR, were recorded weekly. Egg quality traits and antioxidant parameters in liver and intestinal tissues were assessed along with pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and histopathological scoring. Results: Inclusion of 7.5% MOLM significantly improved egg production (86.5%), egg weight (60.1 g ± desert), and FCR (2.04), compared with the control group ( Conclusion: Incorporating MOLM into the diet significantly improved laying hens' performance, enhanced egg quality, boosted antioxidant capacity, and positively influenced immune responses. These findings highlight the value of MOLM as a natural phytogenic additive with potential benefits for enhancing poultry productivity and overall health.

Indexed as

ChickensMoringa oleiferaAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAntioxidantsDietDietary SupplementsFemalePlant LeavesRandom AllocationAntioxidantsAntioxidant enzymesCytokinesImmune modulationLaying hensMoringa oleifera leaf meal

Identifiers

PMID42376558
PMCPMC13314038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.