Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376527›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Protective potential of

Wurlina Wurlina, Imam Mustofa, Sri Mulyati, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Dewa Ketut Meles, Adeyinka Oye Akintunde, Niluh Suwasanti, Ulul Khoiriyah, Gusti Hardyani, Deny Rama Kusnadi and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Wurlina WurlinaDivision of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Imam MustofaDivision of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Sri MulyatiDivision of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Aswin Rafif KhairullahResearch Center for Veterinary Science, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia.
Dewa Ketut MelesDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Adeyinka Oye AkintundeDepartment of Agriculture and Industrial Technology, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Nigeria.
Niluh SuwasantiDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ulul KhoiriyahProfession Program of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Gusti HardyaniProfession Program of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Deny Rama KusnadiProfession Program of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Nove HidajatiDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Rahmi SugihartutiDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Budi UtomoDivision of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Erma SafitriDivision of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Lilik MaslachahDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Rochmah KurnijasantiDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Suryo KuncorojaktiDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: This study sought to determine the protective effects of ethanolic extract of Methods: Twenty-five rats were randomly assigned to five groups. The rats in the negative control group received 0.5 ml of distilled water and 0.5 ml of 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMC Na) every 4 hours for 21 days. The positive control group (T0) received 0.5 ml of lead acetate solution containing 50 mg/kg BW/day, followed by 0.5 ml of 0.5% CMC Na solution 4 hours later. Groups T1, T2, and T3 were exposed to 0.5 ml of the lead acetate solution (50 mg/kg BW) and subsequently received 0.5 ml of Results: Lead exposure led to significant decreases ( Conclusion:

Indexed as

AntioxidantsMoringa oleiferaOrganometallic CompoundsPlant ExtractsTestisAnimalsMaleOxidative StressPlant LeavesRatsRats, WistarTestosteroneAntioxidantslead acetateOrganometallic CompoundsPlant ExtractsTestosteroneEnvironmental pollutionLead acetateMoringa oleiferaSeminiferous tubuleTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID42376527
PMCPMC13314138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.