ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The histological evaluation of colon tissues offers valuable information for assessing the health and disease process in the intestine of camels. Currently, colon samples are routinely collected during postmortem examination, whereas antemortem sampling is not a common practice. Colonoscopy-guided colon biopsy can be used as a minimally invasive alternative. However, preclinical validation of the technique is essential before clinical translation. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of colonoscopy-guided biopsy and microscopically assess the quality of the collected tissue. Methods: Colon biopsies ( Results: Endoscopy provided clear visualization of the colon lumen and enabled appropriate tissue collection. The procedure was performed quickly and easily, and no evidence of full intestinal perforation was found in any samples. The quality of the histological sections was good, allowing a satisfactory assessment of the mucosal and submucosal layers. Conclusion: Colonoscopy-guided colon biopsy is feasible in practice and a promising clinical technique for live camels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.