Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376479›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026

Molecular Dynamics-Based validation of a quinazoline-based KRAS inhibitor (C9) identified through QSAR-guided discovery.

Stephen Adebayo Osasan, Oche Ambrose George, Olusola Daramola, Oluwafemi Ayodele Adefolalu, Alzahrani A Hind, Mohammad Alshehri Jawaher, Wisdom Onuche Ibrahim, Olanrewaju I Ajetunmobi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen Adebayo Osasan *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ministry of Health (Prince Mishari Bin Saud Hospital), Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.
Oche Ambrose George *University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Olusola DaramolaNorth Devon District Hospital, Barnstaple, United Kingdom.
Oluwafemi Ayodele AdefolaluObafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Osun, Nigeria.
Alzahrani A HindDepartment of Basic Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Al-Baha, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Alshehri JawaherOptometry Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.
Wisdom Onuche IbrahimUniversity of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Olanrewaju I AjetunmobiDepartment of Histopathology, University Hospitals Morecambe Bay, NHS Trust, Kendal, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: KRAS remains one of the most challenging oncogenic targets in lung cancer because of its shallow binding surfaces, conformational flexibility, and limited availability of druggable pockets. In a preceding QSAR-guided screening and molecular docking study, compound C9, a quinazoline-based scaffold, was identified as a potential KRAS inhibitor. However, static docking alone is insufficient to fully characterize ligand stability, conformational persistence, and energetic behavior within dynamic solvent environments. Therefore, the present study employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and end-point free energy calculations to further investigate the dynamic interaction profile of C9 within the KRAS binding pocket. Methods: The four top-ranked docking poses of C9 (Modes 1-4) were subjected to 200 ns explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations. Structural stability and conformational behavior were evaluated using root-mean-square deviation root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (Rg), dynamic cross-correlation matrix (DCCM), principal component analysis (PCA), center-of-mass distance analysis, and residue-wise ligand contact frequency profiling. Binding energetics were further assessed using MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA calculations with energy decomposition analyses. Results: The four binding modes exhibited distinct dynamic and energetic behaviors during the simulations. Modes one and 3 demonstrated comparatively greater structural persistence and reduced conformational instability relative to Modes 2 and 4. Mode one maintained prolonged ligand contact persistence with key switch-region residues, compact conformational sampling, and relatively stable COM distance profiles throughout most of the trajectory. PCA further revealed a comparatively confined conformational basin for Mode 1, consistent with restricted collective motions and reduced conformational dispersion. However, MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA analyses identified unusually large van der Waals energy fluctuations in Modes 1, 2, and 4, suggesting transient steric instability or nonphysical energetic excursions during portions of the simulations. In contrast, Mode 3 exhibited comparatively more stable and physically interpretable interaction energy profiles with sustained negative interaction energies and reduced fluctuation amplitudes. Across all systems, electrostatic interactions represented the dominant favorable energetic contribution to KRAS-C9 binding. Conclusion: The combined structural, dynamic, and energetic analyses indicate that C9 is capable of adopting dynamically persistent binding conformations within the KRAS binding pocket. Among the evaluated docking modes, Modes one and 3 exhibited the most favorable balance between structural persistence and energetic stability. These findings provide computational support for the potential of the quinazoline-based scaffold C9 as a candidate KRAS-targeting compound and establish a mechanistic framework for future structure-guided optimization and experimental validation in KRAS-driven lung cancer systems.

Indexed as

KRASKRAS inhibitorMD simulationQSARquinazoline

Identifiers

PMID42376479
PMCPMC13310900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.