ArticleBrain & spine2026
Simulation speeds up adaptation to the 3D exoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Exoscopes are alternatives to operative microscopes in intraoperative visualization. Transitioning from microscope to exoscope demands new skills. Simulators are effective training tools in multiple fields, including surgery, yet no virtual simulators for exoscope training exist. Research question: We developed a virtual exoscope simulator and evaluated whether short-term simulator training improves exoscope control and microsurgical task performance in novices. Material and methods: Forty medical students without prior surgical experience were randomized to a control group or 45 min of simulator training focused on exoscope control. Both groups then performed a standardized microsurgical test task using a real 3D exoscope. The task was a custom-made physical model requiring participants to transit between concealed metal discs (diameter 0.5 cm) at different depths and visual angles while passing a microneedle with 8-0 thread through them, designed to simultaneously assess exoscope camera control and manual microsurgical performance. All participants completed the task three times in a single session. Results: The simulator group demonstrated superior exoscope control by transitioning between the discs faster (median 4min 26s vs. 5min 17s, p = .009) and entering discs faster (median 4min 8s vs. 8min 1s, p = .0006) than the control group. Both groups improved across trials. The standardized effect size was moderate (Cohen's d = 0.56). Groups did not differ significantly in number of exoscope movements or needle drop frequency. Discussion and conclusion: Brief simulator training enhanced adaptation to exoscope controls and manual task performance in novices. Further studies involving neurosurgeons are needed to determine effect on users who possess established microsurgical skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.