ArticleInflammatory intestinal diseases
Impact of Bowel Rest on Hospitalized Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.
Article in Inflammatory intestinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bowel rest has traditionally been practiced for hospitalized patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Most available evidence for bowel rest in UC originates from the prebiologic era. Therefore, this study evaluated the clinical impact of bowel rest in hospitalized patients with UC under modern therapy. Methods: A retrospective study was performed at a single tertiary hospital, where a change in institutional policy for hospitalized UC patients replaced essential bowel rest with early oral feeding in October 2019. Hospitalized UC patients were classified according to the timing of admission into a bowel rest group (group BR; February 2017-September 2019) and a non-bowel rest group (group non-BR; October 2019-October 2023). The primary outcome was colectomy avoidance. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), central venous catheter (CVC) use, and related complications such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Results: A total of 76 patients were analyzed (38 per group). Colectomy avoidance rate was similar in both groups (84.2% each, Conclusions: Among UC patients able to tolerate oral intake, oral intake was associated with shorter hospitalization and reduced CVC use, suggesting that routine bowel rest may not provide additional benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.