ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2026
Improving core facility service discovery with an AI assistant grounded in institutional web content.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Core facilities source advanced technologies and expertise but can remain under-utilized because researchers, students and early-career scientists, struggle to identify relevant units or cannot articulate appropriate technical inquiries. To enhance access to users, we implemented a domain grounded conversational application based on retrieval augmented generation (RAG). It combines advanced general AI-chat behavior with restricted alignment to core-facility services by uniting a Google Gemini File Search as a structured knowledge base and a Perplexity powered web agent for conceptual scientific queries. The system workflow constrains the agents to institutional domains and routes specific operational questions to a file search knowledge base. As a result, it relies on existing core facility websites and is updated in line with them. This article describes the design of the workflow, how the system is optimized including necessary guardrails to prevent general purpose chat. It proposes evaluation metrics such as veracity, cost per interaction, latency, and examples of usage. The chatbot can help researchers better define their experimental needs, discover relevant facilities they had not previously considered, and thereby increase the visibility and accessibility of institutional research infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.