ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
Computed tomography in the vivo anatomy of rabbit kidneys (
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rabbit kidney is a unipapillary organ. According to other researchers, rabbit kidneys have 6-8 pyramids. Aim: This study aimed to describe the computed tomography (CT) anatomy and dimensions of rabbit kidneys. Methods: Ten sexually mature, clinically healthy rabbits were divided into two groups (five males and five females). The animals were positioned in the sternal position. A SOMATOM helical computed tomograph was used in the study with consecutive Dicom Viewer reconstructions of the data. Results: On transverse precontrast CT scans, the right kidney was observed between Th13 (L1) and L2-L3, and the left kidney appeared between L2 (L3) and L4 (L5). The CT value of the right kidney was 40.28 ± 6.6 HU, and that of the left kidney was 43.36 ± 5.2 HU. The CT method was precise and found an excellent positive correlation between both kidney length (Y variable) and L2 length (X variable). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.957 for the right kidney and 0.961 for the left kidney at 95% confidence interval. The measured length of both kidneys on CT scans demonstrated a very strong positive correlation with L2 length.Retrospective reconstruction revealed both kidneys as multipapillary organs. Conclusion: The obtained
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.