ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Ceftazidime for Gram-negative bacterial keratitis.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEmpiric keratitis to treat Gram-negative infections is often fortified with tobramycin or monotherapy with fluoroquinolones. Ceftazidime is not generally administered, although it has found success in the past. In this
methodsThis was a retrospective study at an academic tertiary care ophthalmology department. The laboratory records of patients with culture-positive Gram-negative keratitis were evaluated for anti-infective susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria to ceftazidime, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, and polymyxin B. The median minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs μg/ml) of each Gram-negative bacterial group was compared to the established serum standards.
resultsAnalysis of
conclusionBased on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.