ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Codon usage bias and molecular evolution of
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dnajc15, encoding the methylation-controlled J-protein (MCJ) of the HSP40 family, is an endogenous repressor of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and a key regulator of mitochondrial metabolism. The codon usage patterns and molecular evolution of Dnajc15 in birds remain largely uncharacterized. Methods: We present the first systematic characterization of Dnajc15 codon usage patterns and adaptive evolution across 27 bird species representative of 11 avian orders, using codon usage bias analysis, PAML-based selection pressure analysis, and gene family analysis. Results: Codon usage bias analysis revealed a preference for A/U-ending codons and weak overall codon bias (effective codon number: 51.72-61.00). Selection analyses indicated predominant purifying selection (ω = 0.33). The M7 vs. M8 site model identified four candidate positively selected sites (positions 8, 17, 19, and 57), located in the N-terminal region and J-domain of the MCJ protein, though this signal was not corroborated by the M1a vs. M2a comparison, suggesting at most limited or episodic positive selection. Dnajc15 was retained across all examined vertebrate lineages despite widespread contraction of other Dnajc family members. Conclusion: Dnajc15 is a highly conserved component of the avian mitochondrial regulatory system, with limited evidence for adaptive variation at a small number of candidate sites, consistent with strong long-term functional constraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.