ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Postoperative Outcomes of Absorbable versus Nonabsorbable Sutures in Trigger Finger Release Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical release is an effective treatment for refractory cases of trigger finger; however, the optimal suture material for skin closure remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares postoperative outcomes of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures following trigger finger (TF) release. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, including a total of 5 studies in the final analysis, comparing absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures in TF release. Data extraction included suture type, and reported outcomes such as wound complications, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3, with statistical significance set at a Results: Patients who received nonabsorbable sutures had significantly higher odds of wound dehiscence, which was analyzed as a specific wound complication (odds ratio [OR]: 2.83, Conclusions: Nonabsorbable sutures were associated with a higher risk of wound dehiscence, whereas they demonstrated a lower rate of overall wound complications in sensitivity analysis following TF release surgery. These findings highlight differences between individual wound outcomes; however, the available evidence remains limited. Further high-quality studies are required to confirm these results and guide optimal suture selection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.