ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Rib Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Autologous, Fresh-frozen, and Irradiated Cartilage.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Costal cartilage (CC) is a widely used graft material in rhinoplasty, harvested from autologous (ACC) or cadaveric sources, such as fresh-frozen (FFCC) or irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC). Although all graft types carry risks of infection, warping, and revision surgery, their comparative safety profiles remain uncertain. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched from inception to April 2025 for studies evaluating outcomes of ACC, FFCC, or IHCC in rhinoplasty. Primary outcomes included infection, warping, and revision surgery. Data were pooled using random-effects proportional meta-analysis with heterogeneity assessed with I Results: Of 3109 records, 25 studies (n = 2322 patients) met inclusion criteria (ACC = 775, FFCC = 1076, and IHCC = 471). Infection rates were low across all graft types (1%-2%), with low heterogeneity. Warping was similarly infrequent (1%-3%), though moderate heterogeneity was observed across ACC studies. Revision rates demonstrated greater variability, ranging from 1% in FFCC to 7% in ACC and IHCC, with high heterogeneity and funnel plot asymmetry. Post hoc power analyses supported noninferiority of all graft types with respect to infection and warping. Conclusions: Infection and warping are rare complications across graft types, suggestive of comparable safety profiles. Revision outcomes appeared most favorable with FFCC but were limited by heterogeneity and study design. These findings are suggestive of comparable safety profiles among ACC and cadaveric CC grafts. Higher-quality, prospective controlled studies with standardized outcome reporting and follow-up time are required to better inform graft selection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.