ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
Deep learning models for predicting opaque bubble layer morphology of keratorefractive lenticule extraction before laser scanning.
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purposes: To develop deep learning (DL) models for predicting opaque bubble layer (OBL) morphology and area before femtosecond laser scanning in keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) procedures. Methods: A total of 10276 frames from 5138 KLEx surgical videos, involving 2698 patients, were used to construct and validate the DL models. Suction-initiated frames captured before laser scanning were used as input to construct an OBL perceptual attention network (OBLPA-Net) and a DL-based OBL prediction regression model, which were developed to predict the OBL morphology and area in posterior lenticular cut frames during laser scanning. The performance of models was primarily evaluated by Dice coefficient, intersection over union (IoU), and mean absolute error (MAE). Results: The OBLPA-Net demonstrated strong predictive performance for OBL morphology, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.918 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.915-0.921) and an IoU of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.844-0.854) on the validation set. Good generalizability was observed across external test sets. Moreover, to predict the global quantitative OBL measurement (OBL area in cornea), the regression model yielded an MAE of 0.221% (95% CI: 0.201-0.242) in the validation set, with similar results in external test sets. Conclusions: Developing accurate prediction models for intraoperative complications in KLEx across surgical steps is feasible and may aid in refractive surgery decision-making, improve surgical techniques, and enhance surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.