ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Developmental outcomes of young children with an autism diagnosis and its associated clinical correlates.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder is common in children with increasing prevalence, leading to efforts towards early identification and treatment initiation in young children. We aimed to identify the developmental trajectory of young children with an autism diagnosis and clinical factors associated with better developmental outcomes in a real-world setting. Methods: In this study, 38 children (mean age 21.9 ± 4.7 months) who were diagnosed at < 2 years of age with autism had developmental evaluations using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning done at baseline and after 1-2 years post diagnosis and intervention initiation. Results: In the sample, improvements in T-scores were observed for Receptive Language (mean 26.5 to 32.0, p=0.003) and Expressive Language (mean 26.0 to 30.7, p=0.010) at the group level, while Visual Reception, Fine Motor and overall Early Learning Composite did not change significantly at follow-up. Higher baseline T-scores were consistently associated with better follow-up scores across Fine Motor, Receptive Language, Expressive Language and Early Learning Composite domains. Age at initial presentation was significantly associated with Fine Motor outcomes (β = 1.26, p=0.031) while intervention hours were not independently associated with any developmental domain outcomes in the full sample. Among children with baseline developmental delay, higher intervention hours were associated with better follow-up scores in Receptive as well as Expressive Languages and Visual Reception; this was not seen for the entire sample. Conclusions: Our results support the role of early identification and intervention for autism; however, child-level characteristics influence developmental trajectories beyond intervention hours alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.