ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Prediction of hormone receptor status in breast cancer brain metastases using an MRI-based multimodal deep learning framework.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) represent a severe neurological complication affecting 10-20% of patients with metastatic breast cancer, with significant implications for treatment planning and prognosis. Accurate determination of hormone receptor (HR) status is critical for guiding personalized therapeutic strategies. However, traditional biopsy-based assessment is invasive, carries procedural risks, and may not capture the molecular heterogeneity of multiple metastatic lesions. Non-invasive methods for predicting HR status from brain MRI could transform clinical practice, yet existing approaches face three critical limitations: incomplete information utilization from single-modal features, ignored biological correlations among hormone receptors, and underexploited anatomical position information. Methods: We developed a novel multi-modal deep learning (DL) framework leveraging the BCBM-RadioGenomics dataset from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), comprising 268 MRI studies from 165 patients with expert-validated tumor segmentations, 107 PyRadiomics-derived radiomic features, and clinical HR status. Our framework introduces three key methodological components: (1) a three-modal complementary fusion architecture integrating 3D DL features extracted from tumor regions of interest using a 3D ResNet, radiomic features, and anatomical position encoding representing tumor location through hemisphere and brain region one-hot encoding; (2) a multi-task collaborative learning framework with hard parameter sharing to simultaneously predict ER, PR, and HER2 status, employing a weighted loss function to address class imbalance; and (3) a lesion-level sampling strategy to maximize data utilization while preventing data leakage. Results: The proposed model achieved area under the curve (ROC-AUC) values of 0.8763 ± 0.0393 for HER2, 0.8621 ± 0.0304 for ER, and 0.8993 ± 0.0192 for PR prediction, outperforming traditional machine learning baselines. The multi-task learning framework demonstrated improvements for the challenging PR prediction task, while the three-modal fusion architecture consistently outperformed single-modal approaches across all tasks. Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical potential of non-invasive molecular profiling of BCBMs using a multi-modal DL approach. These findings might offer a promising tool for treatment planning and patient management, reducing the need for invasive biopsies while enabling more accurate and comprehensive molecular characterization of brain metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.