ArticleJournal of medical devices2026
Design of a Novel Insertion Training System for Central Venous Catheterization.
Article in Journal of medical devices, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central venous catheterization (CVC) is a common medical procedure with a complication rate of over 15%. Current CVC manikin-based simulators lack anatomical variation and objective feedback of user interaction skills, which greatly hinders effective skill acquisition. To address these limitations, a novel CVC insertion training system was developed and integrated with the Advanced Dynamic Haptic Robotic Trainer (DHRT+). This insertion training system contains a sensorized syringe, custom tissue phantom, and a tool detection subsystem, allowing residents to practice nearly the entire CVC procedure with realistic haptics and automated feedback on subcutaneous tool positioning. Five experiments were conducted to assess the haptic fidelity of the sensorized syringe and custom tissue and to evaluate the accuracy of subcutaneous tool detection. Results showed that the sensorized syringe, which detects aspiration and simulates arterial and venous flash, accurately reproduced clinical aspiration forces. The custom tissue phantom provided realistic force feedback during ultrasound (US) compression and needle insertion, comparable to that of commercial tissue phantoms at a substantially lower cost. The color sensors used to distinguish between inserted guidewires and catheters accurately verified tool depth and enabled tool insertion across multiple positions on the tissue surface. Overall, novel CVC insertion training system components were presented that enabled CVC simulation and provided accurate measurement on aspiration, guidewire depth, and catheter depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.