ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Toward a decolonial One Health: Findings from a participatory action research initiative with indigenous, Campesino, and Afro-descendant communities in the Amazon.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The One Health approach is central to addressing pandemic and planetary crises. However, its framework, predominantly shaped by perspectives from the Global North, has significant limitations with respect to equity and effectiveness in the Global South, particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean. This article develops a critical and decolonial One Health perspective structured around arguments aimed at overcoming four central limitations of the current framework: 1) the predominance of perspectives from the Global North that prioritize health security over local endemic problems; 2) instrumental or superficial forms of community participation that reinforce power asymmetries; 3) the lack of interculturality and the marginalization of ancestral knowledge; and 4) the limitations in addressing the structural and interconnected causes of health problems. Results are based on the One Amazon project, a One Health participatory action research initiative conducted with Indigenous, Campesino, and Afro-descendant communities in Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru between 2021 and 2024. Drawing on mixed qualitative and quantitative data, including participatory mapping, semi-structured interviews, and population surveys, the article demonstrates how these methods yielded empirically grounded insights into health, territory, and governance in Amazonian communities. Results show that collaborative research, focused on local needs and involving genuine participation from Amazonian organizations and their communities, including community co-investigators, intercultural dialogue that values ancestral knowledge, and a focus on territorial sovereignty, generated more relevant and sustainable solutions. Ultimately, the findings indicate that a decolonization process grounded in socio-environmental and epistemic justice would enhance the transformative potential of the One Health approach by enabling knowledge from the Global South to inform and enrich the global health agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.