ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Imaging-to-recanalization delay influences perfusion CT threshold calibration for follow-up infarct volume estimation.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging is used in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to estimate admission ischemic core volume (ICV). This retrospective single-center study evaluated how relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) thresholds applied within a single postprocessing software package (syngo.via Neuro Perfusion) relate to follow-up infarct volume (FIV), with emphasis on the effect of imaging-to-recanalization delay. Patients and methods: Among 555 consecutive patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for AIS between January 2016 and October 2021, 236 patients with middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusion were included. Admission ICV was calculated using rCBF thresholds from < 10% to < 30% in 2% increments and compared with FIV on postprocedural non-enhanced CT. Patients achieving complete reperfusion were further analyzed using cumulative 10-minute delay windows from ≤ 90 to ≤ 130 min. Results: Complete reperfusion was achieved in 102 patients. Among patients achieving complete reperfusion within ≤ 100 min (n = 43), the highest observed correlation between admission CTP-derived ICV and FIV was seen at rCBF thresholds of < 22% and < 20% (R=0.86 for both). Between these tied thresholds, rCBF < 20% showed less frequent and smaller-volume ICV overestimation. In the broader subgroup with complete reperfusion within ≤ 120 min (n = 64), the highest observed correlation was seen at rCBF < 24% (R=0.84). Conclusions: In this vendor-specific study, the best-correlating admission CTP-derived ischemic core threshold relative to follow-up infarct volume varied with imaging-to-recanalization delay. This pattern may be relevant when interpreting perfusion-derived core estimates in acute stroke workflows with variable non-avoidable treatment delays, but should be considered exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.