Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376183›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2026

Native Platelet Function and Clinical Outcomes in Very Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Nanzhu Yang, Xiuyuan Zhao, Xin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nanzhu YangDepartment of Neurology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8583-2755
Xiuyuan ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Xin LiDepartment of Neurology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2977-5075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined native platelet function in very elderly patients (≥80 years) not receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, its correlation with routine laboratory parameters, and factors associated with poor 90-day outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 94 very elderly inpatients (80-89 years, n=50; ≥90 years, n=44). Patients on antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or glucocorticoid therapy within 7 days before admission were excluded. Baseline data, laboratory parameters-including ADP‑ and AA‑induced aggregation, platelet count, and 90‑day outcomes were collected. Adverse clinical outcomes occurred in 13 patients during this period. Spearman correlation and Firth penalized logistic regression were used. Results: No differences were found between age groups in platelet count or aggregation rates (all Conclusion: In this cohort of very elderly patients not on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, native platelet function did not differ between octogenarians and nonagenarians and showed no correlation with routine hematological parameters. No statistically significant predictor of poor 90‑day outcomes was identified. The small number of outcome events (n=13) limits statistical power, so these findings should be considered exploratory. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePlatelet AggregationPlatelet CountPlatelet Function TestsProthrombin TimeRetrospective Studiesclinical outcomeplatelet aggregationplatelet functionrisk factorvery elderly

Identifiers

PMID42376183
PMCPMC13313003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.