ArticleAcademic pathology
Student-led pathology elective expands early exposure and strengthens specialty interest at an osteopathic medical school.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few medical schools, particularly those without dedicated pathology departments, offer preclinical pathology electives. To address this gap, faculty at Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine and the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-College of Osteopathic Medicine Pathology Interest Group launched a student-faculty elective in 2025. The elective comprised eight sessions: seven microscope sign-outs and one grossing workshop. Each began with one hour of independent slide preview, followed by a 2-h sign-out led by a practicing pathologist and delivered in person and via Zoom. Across approximately 30 contact hours, students engaged in microscopic and macroscopic pathology. Twenty-three learners attended at least one session. Anonymous pre- and post-class surveys assessed prior exposure, self-rated confidence, specialty interest, and perceptions of curricular adequacy. Thirteen medical students completed the precourse survey, and fourteen completed the postcourse survey; eleven responses were paired. Baseline experience was limited: 54% had never grossed a specimen or attended a sign-out, and no learner reported high confidence in histology, gross pathology, or laboratory report interpretation. Among paired respondents, mean confidence increased by +1.1 to +1.3 points on a five-point scale, with 82% improving across domains. Post-survey data showed 93% reported the elective reshaped their perception of pathology, 93% planned a pathology rotation, and all respondents recommended the course. In the absence of a pathology department, this student-led, faculty-mentored elective provided rare early exposure. Beyond measurable confidence gains, the program offers a scalable model for institutions seeking to strengthen pathology exposure and the specialty pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.