Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376162›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

CA-MuSiC: a Culture-Aware Multilingual Skill Cognition Model for MOOC review understanding.

Guang Du, Biyuan Ma, Yan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guang DuSchool of English Studies, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Biyuan MaFaculty of Education, Kunming City University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yan LiuBeijing Institute of Economics and Management, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Massive open online course (MOOC) reviews capture learners' emotional evaluations of course quality and perceived vocational value. Existing multilingual aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) methods typically predict generic opinion structures but rarely account for context-conditioned differences in evaluative expression or link reviews to explicit skill perceptions. Methods: We propose CA-MuSiC, a Culture-Aware Multilingual Skill Cognition Model for MOOC review understanding. In this study, "culture-aware" is used in an operational sense: the model uses language, platform/source, and course discipline as observable cultural-context proxies, rather than claiming to measure learners' cultural identities directly. CA-MuSiC combines cultural-context adaptation, external skill grounding from the Course-Skill Atlas and O*NET, hybrid extractive-generative prediction, and teacher-ensemble pseudo-label bootstrapping. Results: Experiments on M-ABSA, EduRABSA, and an English-Chinese cross-lingual target-domain MOOC benchmark show that CA-MuSiC achieves the best results across TASD Micro-F1, ASQE F1, and Skill-grounded Sentiment Macro-F1, reaching 74.62, 61.45, and 69.88, respectively. Ablation studies indicate that skill grounding and pseudo-label bootstrapping are especially important for target-domain performance, whereas cultural-context adaptation improves cross-lingual robustness. Discussion: These findings contribute to educational psychology and learning analytics by modeling MOOC reviews as emotionally expressed learner evaluations of perceived skill development, rather than as mere satisfaction signals.

Indexed as

aspect-based sentiment analysiscross-lingual sentiment analysisculture-aware learningeducational psychologylearning analyticsMOOC reviewsvocational skill cognition

Identifiers

PMID42376162
PMCPMC13312786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.