ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Cognitive behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder: patient-level participation barriers and ketogenic metabolic therapy as a candidate adjunct.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This conceptual analysis synthesizes patient-level participation barriers described in the bipolar disorder CBT literature and considers ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) as a candidate adjunct within a delivery-focused framework. CBT is an evidence-based adjunctive psychotherapy for bipolar disorder, but its clinical value depends on whether patients initiate treatment, sustain session continuity, and complete between-session practice that supports skill use in daily life. In routine care, psychotherapy uptake remains limited, discontinuation can occur early, and patient-level barriers can constrain delivered dose. Early clinical evidence for KMT in bipolar disorder remains preliminary and does not support conclusions regarding disorder-level efficacy or comparative effectiveness. Case reports, retrospective analyses, and pilot trials describe KMT-associated change in domains that overlap with capacity for CBT participation, including mood stability, sleep, energy, anxiety, cognition, and functioning. To date, no studies have directly tested whether KMT improves CBT participation outcomes (initiation, continuity, or between-session practice) in bipolar disorder. This article presents a participation-capacity framework that evaluates KMT as an adjunct to guideline-consistent care and operationalizes research priorities for measuring participation, feasibility, and fidelity across psychotherapy dose, between-session practice, and verified ketosis, rather than symptom change alone. The model specifies sequential decision points for introducing KMT before CBT when participation capacity limits initiation or early continuity, or after participation barriers emerge. CBT is initiated or resumed when pre-specified participation-readiness indicators suggest that an adequate CBT dose can be delivered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.