ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The first scene of artificial intelligence curriculum reform: longitudinal evidence on teachers' stress and multidimensional anxiety.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The formal incorporation of artificial intelligence courses into basic education has raised a key issue for the effective implementation of the curriculum: whether teachers can withstand the continuously rising teaching pressure in the early phase of reform and prevent such pressure from further developing into teaching anxiety. Limited attention has been paid to the persistent influence of teachers' perceived AI teaching stress on teaching anxiety and the potential buffering role of school support in this process. Methods: Drawing on two-wave longitudinal tracking data, this study analyzed 553 valid primary and secondary school teachers at T1 and 348 matched teachers at T2 to examine the persistent impact of perceived AI teaching stress on teaching anxiety, as well as the buffering effect of school support. Results: Teachers' stress and anxiety levels at T2 were both higher than those at T1, indicating an upward trend for both in the early stage of reform. Stress exerted a stable and significant positive effect on anxiety: stress at T1 significantly predicted anxiety at T1 (β ranging from 0.382 to 0.428, Discussion: The findings indicate that teacher anxiety in the early phase of artificial intelligence curriculum reform is not a short-term psychological fluctuation, but a sustained psychological risk. This highlights the necessity for schools to identify such anxiety early and implement systematic interventions to address it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.