Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376109›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Evaluation of natural plant extracts as alternatives to chemical antiparasitics in

Somia Mustafa Elagib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Somia Mustafa ElagibBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Baha University, Al Bahah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coccidiosis caused by Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the anticoccidial efficacy of selected natural plant extracts as alternatives to conventional chemical antiparasitic drugs in broiler chickens experimentally infected with Methods: Broiler chickens were allocated into four experimental groups: non-infected control, infected untreated control, chemically treated, and plant extract-treated groups. Birds were monitored for growth performance, fecal oocyst shedding, intestinal lesion scores, histopathological changes, hematological parameters, and immunological, biochemical, and antioxidant responses. Results: Plant extract supplementation significantly improved body weight gain and feed conversion ratio, reduced oocyst shedding, and lowered intestinal lesion scores compared with infected untreated birds ( Conclusion: The evaluated plant extracts demonstrated pronounced anticoccidial, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant effects, with efficacy comparable to that of chemical anticoccidials. These findings support the potential use of natural plant extracts as safe, effective, and sustainable alternatives for controlling coccidiosis in poultry production.

Indexed as

ChickensCoccidiosisCoccidiostatsEimeriaPlant ExtractsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsFecesCoccidiostatsPlant ExtractsAnticoccidial activityBroiler chickensCoccidiosisDrug resistancePlant extracts

Identifiers

PMID42376109
PMCPMC13313898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.