ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Imaging characteristics of gastrointestinal foreign bodies in children and analysis of risk factors associated with the severity of complications.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and risk factors for complications of gastrointestinal foreign bodies in children, and to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 foreign body retention sites in 71 pediatric patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal foreign bodies in a hospital from August 2020 to December 2025. Data including demographic characteristics, types of foreign bodies, imaging findings, complications, and treatment methods were collected. Foreign bodies were classified into six categories. Retention time was defined as the interval from the confirmed or most suspected time of ingestion to the time of imaging examination. Interobserver agreement for ultrasound interpretation was assessed using Cohen's Results: Among 71 children, 57.7% were male; median age 3 years. Magnetic beads were most common (54.9%), followed by coins (12.7%) and water-absorbing beads (8.5%). The small intestine was the main impaction site (41.5%). Complications occurred in 50 patients (70.4%): perforation in 32 (45.1%) and obstruction in 26 (36.6%). Magnetic beads caused perforation in 71.8%; water beads caused obstruction in 100%. Ultrasound effectively detected radiolucent foreign bodies, whereas plain radiography did not. Independent risk factors for complications included sharp/corrosive foreign bodies (OR = 5.12), retention time >24 h (OR = 4.87), upper gastrointestinal location (OR = 3.21), and symptomatic presentation (OR = 3.94) (all Conclusion: Magnetic beads are the most common and high-risk gastrointestinal foreign bodies in children. Ultrasound is valuable for detecting radiolucent objects. Retention time >24 h, upper gastrointestinal location, and symptoms warrant early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.