ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Contemporary Practices in the Assessment and Management of Climacturia: Results from an International Survey.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Climacturia is a distressing but underrecognized complication following prostate cancer treatment. Despite increasing awareness, its assessment and management remain heterogeneous in clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate current diagnostic and therapeutic practices for climacturia among expert urologists and to propose a preliminary, practice-based Climacturia Assessment Tool. Design setting and participants: A 34-item survey was distributed to members of the Trauma and Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) and the European Association of Urology Section of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (ESGURS). Fifty-one urologists and eight doctors in training completed the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Survey responses were summarized using medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]) and frequencies. Results and limitations: Among the participants, 86% correctly defined climacturia, but only 59% routinely assessed it. Approaches to severity assessment were highly variable. Estimated prevalence ranged from 5% to 30%, depending on timing and association with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or erectile dysfunction. Across 24 clinical scenarios, conservative strategies predominated in mild cases, male slings in moderate SUI-associated scenarios, artificial urinary sphincters in severe SUIs, and the Mini-Jupette procedure when penile prosthesis was required. Conclusions: Current assessment and management of climacturia vary substantially among participants. These findings highlight unmet needs in standardization and support further validation of structured assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.