Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376019›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Menthol inhalation relieves dyspnoea through the brain.

Lucas Vanden Bossche, Samantha Piers, Michele R Schaeffer, Valentina Jelinčić, Kristin Verbeke, Clara Batsleer, Lotte Albert, Dennis Jensen, Wim Janssens, Thierry Troosters and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lucas Vanden BosscheResearch Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Samantha PiersResearch Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michele R SchaefferResearch Group for Rehabilitation in Internal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9232-9361
Valentina JelinčićResearch Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristin VerbekeTranslational Research Center in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Clara BatsleerResearch Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lotte AlbertResearch Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dennis JensenClinical Exercise and Respiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Wim JanssensDepartment of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-2982
Thierry TroostersResearch Group for Rehabilitation in Internal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniel LangerResearch Group for Rehabilitation in Internal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-9482
Andreas von LeupoldtResearch Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-8131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Menthol inhalation (MI) relieves dyspnoea in healthy individuals and people with respiratory disorders, independent of changes in breathing patterns and respiratory muscle electromyography activity. Thus, the underlying working mechanism of MI is unknown. We tested whether MI reduces dyspnoea by attenuating the neural processing of afferent respiratory sensations, without altering respiratory patterns and the efferent neural drive to breathe. Methods: Thirty healthy adults completed four 5-min trials of strong inspiratory resistive loaded breathing: two with MI and two with strawberry scent inhalation (SI; placebo control), in counterbalanced order. Paired inspiratory occlusions (150 ms) were randomly administered every 2-6 breaths to evoke respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREPs) in the electroencephalogram, reflecting neural processing of respiratory signals. Respiratory parameters were measured continuously, and neural drive to breathe was assessed Results: Dyspnoea intensity (Δ=-0.67 modified Borg units, p=0.003, d=-0.56), air hunger (p<0.001), and mental breathing effort (p=0.004) were lower with MI compared with SI. The RREP P2 mean amplitude was lower with MI (Δ=-1.51 µV, p=0.04, d=0.38), and exploratory analysis revealed an additional reduced "P3frontal" RREP component (p=0.04). Respiratory parameters and P0.1 showed only minor differences between conditions. Conclusions: MI relieved dyspnoea with concurrent changes in the neural processing of respiratory sensations, in the absence of meaningful changes in respiratory patterns or neural drive to breathe. This suggests that MI relieves dyspnoea

Identifiers

PMID42376019
PMCPMC13312038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.