ArticleERJ open research2026
Understanding the perceptions and experiences of adults with early-onset neuromuscular disorders using noninvasive ventilation in making healthcare decisions.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adults with early-onset neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) experience increasing physical limitations and multisystem complications that require ongoing, multifaceted decisions about their care and support. Contemporary and evolving treatment options have introduced greater prognostic uncertainty, adding further complexity. This study addresses the lack of data drawn directly from affected individuals regarding their actual and preferred roles in healthcare-related decision-making and aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the supportive factors and barriers that they identify. Methods: A purposive sample of participants was taken from a larger quantitative study. Semi-structured individual interviews were used to obtain qualitative data. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and evaluated using inductive thematic analysis. Results: 12 participants (50% female, aged 25-55 years) with a range of NMDs ( Conclusions: Adults with early-onset NMDs are active, informed decision-makers whose autonomy is supported by trusted relationships, relevant information and opportunities to reflect on changing health needs. They balance clinical priorities with independence, wellbeing, and daily life. Peer, family, and clinical partnerships facilitate meaningful engagement. Fragmented care and limited support during changes and transitions can hinder timely and person-centred decisions. Embedding psychological support and strengthening continuity and coordination of services offer opportunities to enhance shared decision-making and deliver care aligned with patients' values and lived experience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.