ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Engagement with the national electronic health records by people with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Value in app store metadata and user reviews: A dual perspective on quality of Parkinson's and dementia apps.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) require coordinated, multidisciplinary care, which can be facilitated by Electronic Health Records (EHRs) enabling efficient information exchange and personalized decision-making. Understanding which patient-, healthcare provider- (HCP), and technology-related factors drive EHR engagement among older population with complex health needs is crucial for the successful adoption and advancement of digital transformation in medicine. Methods: Guided by the digital health empowerment framework, this cross-sectional study explored patient engagement with the national EHRs among 191 PwPD in Luxembourg, using validated instruments, including eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) and Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Results: Findings from the descriptive and regression analysis showed that only 29.8% respondents engaged multiple times with their personal EHR in the previous year, 70.2% have not used it, including 40.8 % who have never access it since the launch of EHR system. Key factors associated with higher engagement with personal EHR included being born in Luxembourg, milder disease severity, and higher digital health literacy, as well as receiving support from HCPs to use personal EHR. Surprisingly, higher trust in HCPs and greater health literacy were linked to lower personal EHR usage. Conclusions: Personal EHR engagement among the vulnerable aging population is influenced by a complex interplay of patient, HCP, and technology-related factors, which must be addressed holistically to ensure inclusive usage and adherence to digital health tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.