ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Metatarsus Adductus Association With Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: Radiographic Analysis.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metatarsus adductus is a congenital forefoot deformity associated with pathologies including proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. The aim of this study is to assess the presence of metatarsus adductus and alignment in patients with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. We hypothesize that there is an increased incidence of metatarsus adductus in patients with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who were treated for fifth metatarsal fractures from 2022 to 2024. Radiographic measurements including metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), lateral Meary angle, fracture zone, and foot alignment were recorded for each fracture. Results: Forty-nine patients were included. Patients with a zone 1 fracture had an average MAA of 14.2°. Of these patients, 10% had a cavus and 18% had a planus midfoot. Patients with a zone 2 fracture had an average MAA of 19.9°. Of these patients, none were cavus and 4% were planus. Patients with a zone 3 fracture had an average MAA of 26.8°. Four percent of patients had a cavus midfoot, whereas 4% had planus. Patients with a dancer's fracture had an average MAA of 15°. Of these patients, 8% were cavus and 4% were planus. A significant difference ( Conclusion: Cavovarus deformity was infrequent in our cohort, whereas most patients had some degree of metatarsus adductus. Twenty-two percent in zone 1 and 6% in zone 2 were mild metatarsus adductus. Six percent in zone 2 and zone 3 were moderate, whereas 10% in zone 3 were severe. The authors recommend assessing for the presence of metatarsus adductus in patients with fifth metatarsal fractures, particularly zone 2 and 3, although further study in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.