ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
Assessment of health conditions in Khmer native × Hariana crossbred cattle under a free-grazing system.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cattle play an important role in supporting food security and rural livelihoods economy in Cambodia. However, cattle production systems in Cambodia remain largely traditional, characterized by extensive grazing, limited feed supplementation, low genetic potential, and inadequate health management, which result in low productivity and increased vulnerability to diseases. Therefore, ensuring sustainable productivity in the cattle sector in Cambodia requires a focus on health management, which is essential to enhance animal health resilience and reduce disease vulnerability. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the condition of Khmer native × Hariana crossbred cattle under a free-grazing system, with a focus on differences between males and females. Methods: Ten cattle were selected, consisting of five males (206.80 ± 10.15 kg/head) and five females (192.60 ± 12.59 kg/head) based on their initial body weight (IBW). The dietary treatments were arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with two treatments and five replications, each replication containing one animal. The feeding treatments were as follows: FGm, free-grazing (male), and FGf, free-grazing (female). Results: The results indeed showed that the IBW and final body weight (FBW) did not differ significantly between the groups ( Conclusion: These findings suggest that free-grazing management may adversely affect cattle health. Thus, to ensure clear and measurable results, data collection should be conducted over a longer period in future research on native crossbred beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.