ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
Effectiveness of neem (
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Newcastle disease (ND) is the primary constraint on local chicken production in family poultry farming systems in Niger. During epidemic periods, producers commonly resort to locally available resources to manage the disease. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the infusion of neem bark ( Methods: Eighty local chickens were allocated across two experimental sites. The chickens were further divided into four treatment groups within each site. Each group received ad libitum access to drinking water containing neem bark treatment for 2 weeks. The treatments consisted of T0, T13, T26, and T39, corresponding to 0, 13, 26, and 39 g of neem bark per liter of water, respectively. The data collected included feed intake, live weight of chickens, disease prevalence, and mortality rates. Statistical analyses were performed using R software. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were applied to evaluate the linear and quadratic responses to the different doses of neem bark for treating ND. Survival analysis was performed to determine mortality. Results: Indicated a general decline in feed intake and live weight across all groups. The disease prevalence increased, but without significant linear or quadratic effects ( Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of using traditional vaccines as the main approach to prevent disease outbreaks. No therapeutic benefit was observed from using neem bark in chicken drinking water for ND treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.