Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375930›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Chick welfare in a large, commercial chicken hatchery: A case study.

Jenny L Mace, Andrew Knight

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenny L MaceCentre for Ethics, Philosophy, and Public Affairs, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Andrew KnightSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, approximately 1.8 billion chicks are hatched every month in commercial hatcheries. A typical commercial hatchery is a high-speed and stressful environment. Not only is chick welfare impacted while at the hatchery, but chickens' early life experiences can also have long-lasting impacts on their welfare after they are moved from the hatcheries. Additionally, the capacity to suffer in chick embryos (i.e., to experience pain, distress, or other prolonged negative welfare) may commence approximately three days before hatching by embryonic day 18-and likely earlier. Based on this knowledge, this case study sought to assess the prevalence of welfare problems in an exemplar US hatchery. Case Description: A 4-minute video of undercover footage from a large commercial US hatchery was reviewed. Animal-based indicators detailed by the European Food Safety Authority were used to identify animal welfare problems present in the footage. Conclusion: Overall, 17 severe welfare problems with concurrent suffering were identified in the undercover footage. The most severe harms were associated with a high risk of injury or death. These most commonly arose from unsafe equipment that caused chicks to get stuck in machinery, fall off conveyor belts, or be unintentionally put through a high-temperature washer. Late-stage chick embryos were also frequently crushed. The lack of prompt euthanasia meant that many chicks and embryos experienced inhumane deaths. This evidence suggests that there are significant levels of harm and concomitant suffering experienced by many chicks and chick embryos at the aforementioned hatchery-and likely many other commercial hatcheries globally.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareChickensAnimalsUnited StatesChicken welfareChick welfareHatcheryPoultry welfare

Identifiers

PMID42375930
PMCPMC13313814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.