ReviewCureus2026
Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap: Anatomy, Applications, and Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap remains an important regional reconstructive option for soft tissue defects of the hand and wrist because it provides thin, pliable tissue while preserving the major vascular axes of the forearm. This narrative review discusses the anatomical basis, surgical technique, indications, outcomes, complications, and comparative role of the PIA flap in contemporary upper limb reconstruction. Current literature demonstrates generally favorable functional and aesthetic outcomes with reliable soft tissue coverage, particularly for defects involving the dorsal hand, wrist, thumb, and first web space. Although venous congestion and anatomical variability remain recognized limitations, careful surgical planning and technical modifications may reduce complication rates. Compared with alternative regional and free flap options, the PIA flap continues to serve as a valuable vessel-preserving reconstructive technique, particularly for moderate-sized defects requiring durable coverage and satisfactory functional recovery. However, the available evidence is derived predominantly from retrospective case series and observational studies, highlighting the need for prospective comparative studies to further define its role in contemporary upper limb reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.