ArticleCureus2026
Quality of Life of Vietnamese Ostomy Patients: A Multidimensional Assessment Using the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (CoH-QoL-OQ).
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOstomy creation is a life-saving intervention for gastrointestinal and abdominopelvic conditions but is associated with substantial changes in quality of life. This study evaluated the quality of life among ostomy patients using a validated multidimensional instrument.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. Clinical data included demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, and stoma-related features. A subset of patients completed the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (CoH-QoL-OQ). Additional data on daily life, including occupational status, marital status, caregiving, and mobility, were collected through structured interviews. Quality of life was assessed across four domains, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being.
resultsAmong 552 patients, 87 patients in the interview cohort had comparable baseline and stoma-related characteristics to those of the overall cohort, suggesting that the interview cohort was broadly representative of the overall population. Overall quality of life was favorable, with a mean score of 8.26. Spiritual well-being was highest at 9.16, whereas social well-being was lowest at 7.02. Many patients maintained work, travel, and social activities, while others experienced limitations in occupational participation and mobility. Marital relationships remained stable. Stoma duration was the most relevant factor associated with improved outcomes.
conclusionPatients with a stoma can achieve a relatively favorable quality of life through gradual adaptation. Daily life outcomes, including work and social participation, are key components of well-being, highlighting the need for long-term, patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.