ArticleCureus2026
Indian Real-World Data on Acute Cough Evaluation Through Cough Sounds and Auscultation Findings and Its Complications.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The evaluation of acute cough in primary care settings remains inconsistent, and cough sounds are seldom used for evaluation. This retrospective observational study examined how clinicians across different medical specialties utilize cough sounds and auscultations alongside different diagnostic approaches for the evaluation and categorization of acute cough and overall acute cough-related complications. Methods Electronic medical records from 2017 to 2023 for patients with acute cough were analyzed retrospectively across pediatric (<18 years), adult (18-65 years), and elderly (>65 years) age groups. Auscultation patterns, diagnostic investigations, and cough-related complications were analyzed. Results Unspecified cough predominated across all age groups - pediatric: 128,184 (88.22%); adult: 707,788 (78.29%); and elderly: 154,129 (76.48%). The most common auscultatory finding was wheezing reported by pulmonologists (376, 6.73%) in pediatric patients, 2,954 (5.53%) in adults, and 934 (6.45%) in the elderly. Chest X-ray was the primary diagnostic tool across specialties, whereas imaging use was conservative in pediatric populations (3,767, 15.7%), 33,850 (34.9%) in adults, and 7,869 (56.4%) in the elderly. Chest pain emerged as the most predominant complication in 1,631 (6.78%) pediatric patients, 22,906 (23.61%) adults, and 5,095 (36.58%) elderly. Most general practitioners demonstrated nominal use of cough sounds and auscultatory findings for the evaluation of cough, as it is not a regular practice. Conclusion The use of cough sounds and auscultations remains underutilized in practice, especially by general practitioners. Incorporating systematic acoustic analysis, including cough sounds and auscultatory patterns in primary care, could improve acute cough categorization, reduce or better plan diagnostic testing, and enable targeted and prompt treatment. Future research should focus on developing standardized tools and training programs to optimize acute cough management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.