ReviewJournal of children's orthopaedics2026
Telescopic rods vs. non-telescopic rods in the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare revision and complication rates between telescopic and non-telescopic intramedullary rods in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021287054). Databases were searched up to December 2025. Studies reporting surgical outcomes of intramedullary fixation in OI were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Results: Thirty-six studies including 1711 patients and 2459 treated bones were analyzed. Telescopic rods were associated with significantly lower revision rates compared to non-telescopic rods. No significant difference in overall complication rates was observed. Conclusion: Telescopic rods provide improved implant survival and reduce the need for reoperation in growing children with osteogenesis imperfecta, supporting their preferential use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.