Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375744›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2026

Analyzing public responses to Shanghai's strict smoking ban: A data mining study based on 12320 Health Hotline calls.

Lili Shi, Aksara Regmi, Jiaqi Shao, Zi-An He, Yuyang Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lili Shi *Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Aksara Regmi *School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiaqi Shao *School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zi-An HeSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuyang CaiSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study evaluates the public response to Shanghai's strict smoking ban through an analysis of calls made to the 12320 Health Hotline. The focus is on identifying the types of violations reported, the locations involved, and how these calls can inform future enforcement strategies.

methodsWe collected 41614 call records from March 2016 to March 2019 and used natural language processing (NLP) techniques to analyze these data. Calls containing tobacco-related complaints, consultations, help-seeking requests, or suggestions were included.

resultsFollowing the implementation of the amended regulations, tobacco-related hotline activity peaked in March 2017. During this month, 6937 eligible calls were recorded, of which 4705 (68%) were complaints, 1212 (17%) were consultations, and 829 (12%) were help-seeking requests, while only 172 calls (2%) involved suggestions. Workplaces accounted for the largest proportion of reported locations (35%; n=2399), followed by food and beverage establishments (14%; n=960) and leisure or hospitality venues (13%; n=902), with schools least frequently reported (1%; n=86).

conclusionsHotline-based surveillance provides a practical approach for characterizing public concerns related to smoking ban enforcement. Further studies are needed to examine demographic predictors of call patterns, assess long-term trends beyond the initial implementation period, and explore how such data sources may complement conventional tobacco control monitoring systems.

Indexed as

hotlinenatural language processing (NLP)smoking bansocial supervisiontobacco control

Identifiers

PMID42375744
PMCPMC13312267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.