ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Advancing antimicrobial stewardship programs in retirement homes: a quality improvement pilot using prospective audit and feedback.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs in retirement homes, a setting with an older adult population which is at increased risk of antibiotic-related harm. This study evaluated a pharmacist-led prospective audit and feedback (PAF) pilot program in retirement homes. Methods: This quasi-experimental study evaluated antibiotic use in 9 intervention homes and 396 control homes from June 2022 to May 2023 (baseline period), compared to June 2023 to December 2024 (intervention period). PAF was conducted remotely by long-term care pharmacists; recommendations were provided to the prescriber via fax. The primary outcome was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 resident-days. Determinants to implementation were gathered from participating pharmacists and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results: During the intervention, of 794 antibiotic assessments, 89 recommendations were made and 27 (30%) were accepted. Total antibiotic use measured in DOT per 1,000 resident days in intervention homes was similar before and after PAF (54.0 before vs. 57.9 after). Similarly, usage in the control group was relatively stable (49.0 before vs. 51.6 after) (DiD Analysis: +2.4 DOT/1,000 resident days, 95% CI -7.8, 12.3). Barriers to PAF implementation included communication challenges (communication via fax) and limited clinical information (lack of indication on prescription). Facilitators included organizational support and pharmacist motivation. Conclusions: While this pilot had limited uptake and was not associated with a change in antibiotic use, it highlighted important barriers and facilitators for AMS in retirement homes. This initiative strengthened local capabilities for antibiotic use surveillance to support future AMS interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.